NanowrimoI finally reached the 30,000 word mark on the Nanowrimo last night, and it was the last thing I did before I went to bed. I'm totally going to have to rewrite that whole chapter I wrote last night, because it was just awful. Seriously. But 30,000 words is just about on pace to getting to the 50,000 mark by the end of the month. It might be a bit of a struggle, but I think I'll still be able to pull it off.
Dinosaur roundup:If a dinosaur fell in the water, then
turtles would have swum with dinosaurs. This story indicates that a turtle has been discovered that may represent the missing link between exclusively terrestrial turtles about 210 million years ago, and turtles that could swim 164 million years ago. His name would be
Eileanchelys waldmani.
Oh yeah! I can tell that this is the missing link by ... his awkwardly crushed skull? I wish these articles would highlight what in fact leads scientists to believe anything particularly new about these species. Seriously, the academic papers that these reports come from must have some sort of indication. Was it the feet? Was it the shell? Was it the teeth? Damned if we'll be told.What else is neat in Dinosaur Land today? How about the oldest dinosaur footprints ever discovered in the southern hemisphere? Well, perhaps that's not neat, but ...
Archeologists Find Dinosaur Tracks in Bolivia, except archeologists don't look for prehistoric animals, right?
Well, did an archeologist find dinosaur tracks?:
Paleontologist Pablo Gallina described the day he first saw the prints.
"When I stooped down to look at the prints, the other paleontologists were 50 meters ahead and saying There's more here! And above that there were more prints covering 30 meters with 50 or 60 steps all in a line,” Gallina said.
So, the reporter managed to get it right, but the editor decided to read the whole article and then pull a word out of his ass which didn't appear anywhere inside, and use it in the headline. At least he spelled it right, which I sometimes don't do.
The news wire idea:
I'd hate to say that I'm any kind of expert on dinosaurs, because I'm not, at all. I'm a fan, and that's about it. The kind that reads what the experts say, and that's all. An expert will make the discoveries, which I do not do.
However, you can read wire stories that spell names wrong, have no idea what they're talking about, and not reveal the information that people need to know that makes the story interesting. But there are sweeping statements that the editors just miss because they don't know what they're talking about.
For example, the marine reptiles that swam in the oceans during the Mesozoic era were not dinosaurs, yet a turtle hops in the water, and suddenly "Turtles swim with dinosaurs." And no mention of what interpretation of the fossils leads paleontologists to believe this.
And the second article thinks that paleontologists are archeologists - which is like comparing astronomy to astrology. They look a bit similar when written in the English language, and that's about it.
Not long ago I was discussing a news wire idea with a friend: basically, we would crank out material on our favourite subjects and offer them in a news wire for people to pick up and put in their papers. There are thousands of local papers that might sign up for a digital service like this, and make use of the stories. So I would write dinosaur articles that actually use the right names, the right info, and make sense. Not because I'm an expert, but because I'm a fan. It would be like giving back to the dinosaur community who is upset with these errors all of the time.
My friend wanted to write cooking articles, or recipes. We'd have to find others to help contribute - perhaps someone who did articles on cryptozoology, astronomy, archeology, or whatever. Stories that had particular niches that could be interesting once in a while, we'd do that.
So, we get a few hundred papers to sign up and buy into the newswire and we'd collect the subscription fees for our hard work. It's still an idea that could work, but ... I just don't know if right now is when papers are expanding their budgets to include newswire services. They'd certainly be more interested in including more newswire content - I just think they're happy with their existing Reuters, CP and other newswire services that have international scopes.
Anyhow, that's it for an early morning from me. I hope you're all having a great day.